Biden administration seeks legal action to mandate pediatricians’ involvement in transgender surgeries for children
The Battle in Court: Biden Admin Pushes Pediatricians to Perform Trans Surgeries on Kids
The Tennessee-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit is currently embroiled in a heated debate over the extent to which the federal government can compel doctors to violate their beliefs in the name of LGBT politics.
In 2021, President Joe Biden issued an Executive Order that aimed to equate gender identity with biology when it comes to discrimination laws. This means that doctors who hold the belief that boys are born boys and girls are born girls could potentially be forced to provide gender transition drugs, treatments, and surgeries, or face discrimination lawsuits.
The American College of Pediatricians, Catholic Medical Associates, and an OB-GYN doctor specializing in adolescent care have filed a lawsuit to block the enforcement of this order.
“This case challenges whether the federal government can make medical doctors perform gender-transition surgeries, prescribe gender-transition drugs, and speak and write about patients according to gender identity, rather than biological reality—regardless of doctors’ medical judgment or conscientious objections,” the group, represented by the Alliance Defending Freedom, stated in their complaint.
The lawsuit argues that doctors should never be forced to perform procedures that go against their best judgment, conscience, or religion, especially when it involves vulnerable children. The Biden administration’s position is seen as a radical interpretation of the law.
While the lawsuit was initially dismissed in November 2022, the debate over standing masks the real importance of the order. The issue at hand goes beyond legal technicalities and delves into the politicization of medicine and the power of unelected branches of government.
The potential consequences of the Biden administration’s gender-identity mandate are significant, as they infringe upon the personal and professional ethics of physicians who prioritize the Hippocratic Oath to “first, do no harm.” The order has a chilling effect, as doctors across the nation are now faced with the impossible choice between adhering to their conscience or the ideology of federal bureaucrats.
This choice is not only impossible for doctors but also unconstitutional for any citizen. The First Amendment’s religious liberty and free speech clauses were designed to protect the right to live and speak according to one’s convictions and to prevent government-coerced speech or conduct.
The battle in court continues, with the outcome having far-reaching implications for the medical profession and the rights of individuals to practice medicine in accordance with their beliefs.
Read More: Biden Admin Battling in Court to Force Pediatricians to Perform Trans Surgeries on Kids
What are the arguments made by opponents of the Executive Order regarding the violation of doctors’ First Amendment rights and the potential harm to children?
Ng to the patient’s chosen gender, rather than biological sex,” the lawsuit states.
Opponents of the Executive Order argue that it violates the First Amendment rights of doctors, which include the freedom to practice medicine in alignment with their moral and religious beliefs. They believe that forcing doctors to perform gender transition surgeries on children goes against their conscience and professional judgment.
Furthermore, opponents argue that the Executive Order disregards the well-being of children. Gender transition surgeries and interventions have significant risks and potential long-term consequences, both physical and psychological. It is critical for doctors to exercise caution and ensure that minors receive appropriate counseling, mental health support, and comprehensive assessments before making such life-altering decisions.
The American College of Pediatricians highlights the lack of long-term data on the safety and effectiveness of gender-affirming interventions in children. They state that gender dysphoria in children is often temporary and resolves naturally without medical interventions. Forcing doctors to provide these interventions without adequate evidence can lead to irreversible harm to the child’s physical and mental health.
Supporters of the Executive Order argue that it is necessary to protect the rights of transgender individuals, including children, and ensure they receive appropriate medical care. They believe that denying gender transition interventions can contribute to increased rates of mental health issues, self-harm, and suicide among transgender individuals.
However, opponents argue that there are alternative ways to support transgender individuals without compromising the rights of doctors. They suggest implementing policies that prioritize comprehensive mental health support, counseling, and non-invasive interventions that do not involve irreversible medical procedures.
The outcome of this legal battle will have significant implications for healthcare providers across the country. It will determine to what extent doctors can be compelled to violate their moral and religious beliefs in the name of LGBT politics. It will also shape the future of medical care for transgender individuals, particularly minors who are often the most vulnerable in these debates.
As the Tennessee-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit deliberates on this case, the nation awaits a ruling that will have far-reaching consequences. The battle between the federal government and doctors over transgender medical interventions highlights the ongoing struggle for balance between individual rights, medical ethics, and societal progress.
Regardless of the court’s decision, it is important to proceed with caution and prioritize the well-being and autonomy of children when it comes to gender transition interventions. Policies and guidelines should be based on robust evidence and centered around the best interest of the child, ensuring their long-term physical and mental health.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
