Ayotte vetoes bill allowing partisan school board elections – Washington Examiner
New Hampshire Governor Kelly Ayotte vetoed a Republican-supported bill that would have allowed cities and towns to conduct partisan elections for local school boards. The legislation, passed mostly along party lines, aimed to give local governments the option for candidates to run with party affiliations in traditionally nonpartisan school board elections. Ayotte opposed the bill, stating it was unneeded and coudl increase political division within the state. Supporters argued the change would inform voters better and boost turnout in low-interest local school board races. Though, opponents, including the New Hampshire School Board association, expressed concern about increased political influence and the negative impact of partisanship in local education. Lawmakers may attempt to override the veto in the upcoming legislative session, requiring a two-thirds majority in both chambers.
Ayotte vetoes bill allowing partisan school board elections
(The Center Square) — New Hampshire Gov. Kelly Ayotte has vetoed a Republican-backed bill that would have allowed cities and towns to hold partisan elections for governing school boards.
The legislation, approved by the state Legislature in a largely party line vote, would give local governments the option of allowing candidates for nonpartisan local school boards and committees to run on party lines.
But Ayotte, a first-term Republican, vetoed the bill for seeking to fix “a system that is not broken” and said allowing partisan elections for local school boards could lead to more political divisions in the state.
“Local school board elections are run properly and in a nonpartisan manner, and there is no need to fix a system that is not broken,” Ayotte wrote in her veto message. “Making these local elections into partisan fights will create unnecessary division between Granite Staters.”
The measure squeaked through the GOP controlled Legislature in the final days of its session, despite a recommendation by the Senate Election Laws and Municipal Affairs Committee that the bill be killed. Democrats, who constitute a minority in the Legislature, voted in unison against the plan.
Backers of the proposal argued during legislative hearings that school board elections are already partisan affairs, and said allowing candidates to put their party affiliations on the ballot will help voters stay informed.
House Election Laws Committee Chairman Ross Berry, R-Weare, told a Senate panel in May that the changes could also help drive turnout in small town school board elections that traditionally see lackluster interest from voters.
“Non-partisan elections often enable candidates to disguise their true intentions,” Berry said in testimony. “This bill would assist voters in understanding what or who they are voting for.”
The New Hampshire School Board Association took no official position on the proposal, but still argued against its passage during a recent Senate panel hearing. A key concern for the group is the ability of political parties to caucus behind closed doors.
“Less politics in school is a good thing,” Barrett Christina, the association’s executive director, said in testimony in May. “The partisan election provision has been in town law since 1970, but no towns have adopted the option, and they don’t think bringing this to schools is a good idea.”
NEW HAMPSHIRE SENDS BILLS BANNING TRANSGENDER TREATMENTS FOR MINORS TO GOP GOVERNOR’S DESK
The bill will likely be brought back up by the state House of Representatives and State when lawmakers reconvene this fall to consider overriding Ayotte’s vetoes from the recent session.
Lawmakers backing the measure would need a super-majority, or a two-thirds vote in both chambers, to override the governor’s objections and make it a law.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
