Autopen Used To Alter Pardons After Biden Allegedly OK’d Them
The article reports that former President Joe Biden’s staff used an autopen device to apply his signature on pardon documents after he had allegedly approved them, without his direct involvement in signing the final versions. According to a New York Times report, Biden did not individually approve each name for categorical pardons but set the criteria for sentence reductions. After Biden signed off on these standards, staff made “small changes” to the pardons and used the autopen to finalize the documents, viewing this as a routine practice.
Biden acknowledged using the autopen due to the large number of pardons but insisted he made all decisions. However, internal emails cited by the Times offer no concrete proof that Biden gave oral approval for all changes. Additionally, Neera Tanden, former head of Biden’s Domestic Policy Council, admitted in a House Oversight Committee meeting that she authorized autopen signatures without knowing who gave final approval.
Former President Donald Trump launched an examination into the use of the autopen, questioning whether Biden was personally managing executive duties. A memo directing Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate claimed Biden’s aides abused presidential signature power via the autopen to conceal cognitive decline and mask who actually exercised executive authority. The article underscores concerns about transparency and the proper execution of presidential powers during Biden’s governance.
A report from The New York Times indicates that former President Joe Biden’s staffers used the autopen to sign off on changes to pardons without notifying the president.
The article states that Biden “did not individually approve each name for the categorical pardons that applied to large numbers of people, he and aides confirmed. Rather, after extensive discussion of different possible criteria, he signed off on the standards he wanted to be used to determine which convicts would qualify for a reduction in sentence,” The Times’ Charlie Savage and Tyler Pager wrote.
According to the report, however, “small changes to the list” kept occurring after Biden “signed off,” and so, “rather than ask Mr. Biden to keep signing revised versions, his staff waited and then ran the final version through the autopen, which they saw as a routine procedure.”
While Biden himself reportedly insisted he made “every decision,” he did add, according to The Times, that “he had his staff use an autopen replicating his signature on the clemency warrants because ‘we’re talking about a whole lot of people.’”
And while The Times claims that internal emails “show … that the Biden White House had a process to establish that Mr. Biden had orally made decisions in meetings before the staff secretary, Stefanie Feldman, who managed use of the autopen, would have clemency records put through the signing device,” there’s no tangible proof provided that Biden gave his oral approval.
Just weeks before The Times released the report, Biden’s former head of Domestic Policy Council Neera Tanden said in a closed-door meeting with the House Oversight Committee that she authorized the use of autopen signatures on documents even though she didn’t know who gave the final approval, Fox News reported. Tanden reportedly said she “rarely interacted with Biden,” as Jacqueline Annis-Levings wrote for The Federalist.
[READNEXT:[READNEXT:Here Are 9 Questions About The Biden White House That Must Be Answered After Cancer Diagnosis]
President Donald Trump announced in June an investigation into whether Biden was actually running the country or whether his staff was using an autopen to carry out the duties of the executive branch.
A memo instructing Attorney General Pam Bondi to open the investigation stated that “it has become increasingly apparent that former President Biden’s aides abused the power of Presidential signatures through the use of an autopen to conceal Biden’s cognitive decline and assert Article II authority.”
“This conspiracy marks one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history. The American public was purposefully shielded from discovering who wielded the executive power, all while Biden’s signature was deployed across thousands of documents to effect radical policy shifts,” the memo continued.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."