Appeals court hands Trump victory by allowing new refugee ban – Washington Examiner
A federal appeals court recently ruled in favor of the Trump governance by allowing a ban on new refugee admissions to resume. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals clarified that the administration could halt the acceptance of new refugees, although those conditionally approved before Trump’s inauguration must be allowed to enter the U.S. This decision is a temporary stay of a lower court’s ruling that had blocked the executive order intended to reshape U.S. refugee policy.
The lawsuit was initiated by nonprofit organizations and refugees arguing that the executive order violated the Refugee Act of 1980, highlighting the hardships faced by families waiting for reunification. A previous ruling had indicated that the administration needed to continue fulfilling its contracts with refugee resettlement programs, though the appeals court has yet to address this injunction. The ongoing legal battle reflects broader tensions related to immigration policies under the Trump administration.
Appeals court hands partial victory to Trump by allowing refugee ban to resume
A federal appeals court on Tuesday paused a lower court’s decision that blocked the Trump administration from rejecting new refugees, a small victory for the White House in its efforts to reshape immigration policy.
A three-judge panel in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals comprising two Republican and one Democratic appointee said anyone conditionally approved by the government as a refugee before President Donald Trump took office must be allowed to keep their refugee status and enter the country. But Trump had the authority to halt acceptance of all new refugees, the panel found.
The panel’s decision is a temporary stay of a lower court’s preliminary injunction, and the stay will remain in effect through at least the end of April while the case plays out in the appellate court.
The case centers on a lawsuit brought in February by faith-based nonprofit groups and numerous refugees and their family members challenging Trump’s executive order titled “Realigning the United States Refugee Admissions Program.”
Citing the U.S.’s inability to “absorb large numbers of migrants,” the order indefinitely suspended the government’s acceptance of new refugees into the country, a practice that was established through the Refugee Act in 1980.
The plaintiffs shared their stories in court filings, including an Idaho mother who was a U.S. citizen waiting to be reunited with her daughter. The daughter applied from South Africa to move to the U.S. as a refugee, and her application had been pending for years before Trump took office.
The plaintiffs’ lawsuit argued that the executive order and subsequent freeze on all money the government normally paid nonprofit groups to resettle refugees in the U.S. violated the Refugee Act.
Trump’s actions “have placed the lives of hundreds of thousands of refugees on hold, left families separated without hope of reuniting, threatened the survival of those who recently arrived in the United States, created an existential crisis for the nonprofit organizations that serve them, and left the future of the [refugee resettlement program] hanging in the balance,” the plaintiffs’ attorneys wrote.
Judge Jamal Whitehead, a former President Joe Biden appointee serving in Washington State, temporarily blocked the executive order in February, saying it improperly nullified a congressionally established program. This week, Whitehead issued a second preliminary injunction requiring the administration to continue fulfilling its contracts with refugee resettlement programs. The Ninth Circuit has not addressed that injunction.
CONGRESS ‘IRATE’ OVER ASTONISHING NATIONAL SECURITY BREACH
The case is one of dozens across the country in which the Trump administration is testing the president’s ability to shrink and align the executive branch with his policy priorities, which include lowering legal and illegal immigration levels.
“Applicable law empowers the President to limit the entry of aliens into the country, and that power is heightened in the context of refugees,” Department of Justice attorneys argued in their court filings in the refugee case.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
