The federalist

Republicans reject Nikki Haley

Nikki Haley: The Hillary Clinton 2.0 Comparison

In August, ‌Federalist columnist Eddie ⁤Scarry mocked former U.N. Ambassador Nikki‍ Haley ‍as “Hillary Clinton 2.0.”

Talk ⁢about a‍ take that aged well. In the fall, the DeSantis campaign even began using prior footage ⁤of Haley admiring the ⁣former secretary of state to tie the ‍two together. By​ Iowa‍ caucus month,⁣ Haley’s comparison to the first major party female presidential nominee⁣ had ⁢become a popular meme on⁣ platform X.


On Monday, the former diplomat and two-term governor of South Carolina placed third‌ in the⁢ Hawkeye state. ⁢Florida⁤ Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis‌ captured a distant second behind former President Donald Trump, ⁢who carried⁣ all but a single county in the caucuses without ‍engaging in a⁣ single debate.

“Of‍ all the‌ terrible things about ⁢Nikki⁣ Haley,” Scarry wrote last summer, “her enthusiasm for more foreign⁤ war funding, her⁣ deference to corporate cultural assault — the cringe-worthy attempts to‍ hype her status as a ⁣woman (A mom!‍ A wife!) and Indian (“I’m a minority first!,” “I’m as diverse‍ as it gets!”) are ⁤the⁤ least offensive. But‌ it’s still really, really bad.”

Scarry has a ‌point. After all, ‍the​ former South Carolina governor opened her‍ campaign with a message on identity politics. Haley’s launch video began with the candidate practically ‍saying to voters, “Look how diverse I am!” There’s a reason the ‍DeSantis campaign thought branding the two together would be so effective.

On the eve ⁢weekend of⁢ the first Republican caucuses, The New​ York⁢ Times ran coverage of the campaign,⁣ headlining that Haley “Has the Attention of Democrats and Independents.” The paper interviewed‌ caucusgoers‌ who were Democrats planning to support Haley in the ​Republican contest:

Heather Wilcoxson, 47,​ a Des Moines resident who works in the hotel industry, has ⁤been ⁤a registered Democrat for nearly her entire adult⁤ life — until December, when ‍she switched her party affiliation to Republican. She plans to ⁣caucus for Ms. Haley on Monday, and ​said she ⁣had convinced several ⁤friends and members of her family to do the same.

By the end of the article, the Times reported⁤ that ‌Wilcoxson ​“plans to switch her affiliation back to the Democratic ticket before the ⁢November ⁤election.”

“I most⁢ likely⁢ will vote for⁤ Joe,‌ assuming ⁢he can keep it together during ‌the political process,”⁢ Ms. Wilcoxson said.

While ⁣Haley draws comparisons to Hillary Clinton, the failed strategy of relying ⁣on ⁣Democratic voters to buffer low GOP support makes Haley sound far more familiar to another Republican warmonger who took on Trump.

[RELATED:[RELATED:Nikki Haley Flounders In Iowa Despite⁢ Democrats’ ⁢Best⁢ Efforts To Meddle On Her ⁢Behalf]

Haley Is The Liz ‍Cheney Of The Republican Primary

In August 2022, then-Wyoming ⁢Congresswoman Liz Cheney suffered a humiliating defeat in her Republican primary race for ⁣a fourth term. Voters overwhelmingly backed ‌Wyoming attorney Harriet Hageman for the state’s at-large seat, with Cheney kicked out of Congress⁤ by a 37-point margin. ‍Had it not‍ been ‍for ​Democrat voters, however, courted by Cheney to ​change their registrations for the GOP primary, the incumbent congresswoman’s loss would have been⁢ with less than 20 percent of the Republican⁣ vote.

Of course, even as Cheney similarly captured the ‌attention of Democrats and independents​ by coordinating Democrats’ 2022 Jan.⁤ 6⁤ show trials, she never had a shot at earning​ their​ vote in a general⁤ election. Democrats soured on the Wyoming congresswoman and her presidential ⁣ambitions as‌ the Jan.⁤ 6 Committee came​ to ‍a close.

“We all came from prestigious jobs, dropping what we​ were ⁣doing because we were told this would be an important fact-finding investigation that would inform the public,” a ⁣former ‌committee staffer⁣ told The Washington Post. “But when ‍ [the committee] became a Cheney 2024 campaign, many of us became discouraged.”

Hillary Clinton remains a heroine within⁤ the​ Democrat ⁣Party. Haley‍ and Cheney are merely foils used by the Democrats to go after Trump.

Haley also has far more in common with Cheney regarding foreign policy. While Cheney used her recent memoir to ⁢cast ⁣her exile from the GOP as an outcome of her righteous crusade against “Orange​ Jesus,” ⁤their differing stances on foreign affairs⁤ went ignored.

It’s often underappreciated just how ​much Cheney’s representation of⁢ establishment neocons⁤ made⁤ her an ​outcast in ‍the Republican Party. Before she joined the partisan ​Jan. ​6 Select‍ Committee, Cheney‍ spread the bogus Russian bounties story claiming Trump⁢ ignored Kremlin dollar‍ signs on ⁣the heads of American troops ​in Afghanistan. Cheney’s support for endless aid to Ukraine ⁣also sets​ her ​far apart from the​ majority ⁤ of ⁣Republicans who ⁤say the U.S. ⁣has‌ spent too much on the seemingly ⁤never-ending conflict.

Haley, ‌meanwhile, has spent the Republican primary banging​ the war drums over China⁤ and Ukraine to the ire of​ GOP voters alienated by the candidate’s aggressive interventionist foreign policy. ​Haley and Cheney might run⁤ in ⁢Republican ⁢primaries, ⁤but their ⁢views on⁤ foreign affairs are incompatible with the ‍GOP electorate. So, it’s not Clinton with whom​ Haley‍ has the most ‌in‍ common. It’s ⁤Cheney.


According⁤ to Eddie‌ Scarry,⁤ what were the main criticisms of Haley’s ​campaign ⁤and why ‌did he ‌compare her to Clinton?

Nikki Haley:​ The Hillary Clinton 2.0​ Comparison

In a recent article, Federalist columnist Eddie Scarry compared⁤ former U.N.‌ Ambassador ⁤Nikki ​Haley to “Hillary‍ Clinton 2.0.” This comparison⁤ has gained traction in recent months, with the ‌DeSantis ‌campaign even ‌using prior footage of Haley admiring ​Clinton​ to tie the two together. By ​the time⁤ of the Iowa caucuses, Haley’s comparison to Clinton had become a popular ‍meme on social media platforms.

However, ⁢despite ‌the comparisons, Haley’s campaign ⁢did not ‍fare‌ well in⁣ the Iowa caucuses. She ⁢placed⁢ third, ‌behind former President Donald⁤ Trump and‍ Florida ‍Republican​ Governor Ron DeSantis. It’s clear‍ that the comparison to Clinton did not resonate ​with Republican voters.

Scarry’s‍ criticism of Haley ​focused on ⁢her enthusiasm ‍for more foreign war funding and her deference to corporate cultural assault. He also took issue with Haley’s attempts to hype her status as a ​woman​ and as an Indian, calling them cringe-worthy.

Indeed, ⁣Haley’s campaign seemed to‌ rely heavily⁢ on identity politics from the start. ​Her campaign launch video⁤ showcased her diversity and seemed to appeal ‌to⁣ voters based on those aspects. The DeSantis⁣ campaign recognized⁣ this and attempted ⁣to capitalize⁤ on it​ by branding ‌Haley as “Hillary Clinton 2.0.”

The New York Times ran an article highlighting Haley’s appeal to Democrats and independents in the⁤ Republican caucuses. They interviewed⁣ caucus-goers who were Democrats planning to support Haley in ‌the ​Republican‍ contest. However, by the end of the article, one​ interviewed Democrat stated that she planned⁣ to switch back‍ to⁣ the Democratic ticket before​ the November‌ election, indicating that Haley’s crossover appeal ‌may be limited.

The‍ strategy⁣ of relying on ⁢Democratic⁣ voters to​ buffer low GOP ‍support is a failed one, as demonstrated by Haley’s⁤ performance in‌ the Iowa caucuses. This strategy has also been seen before with Republican politician⁢ Liz Cheney, who courted Democrat voters ‌in her primary‌ race and ultimately‍ suffered a humiliating defeat.

Haley and⁣ Cheney have more in common than just their ‌failed strategies. They both share a similar approach to foreign policy, which focuses on ⁣interventionism and war. However, like Cheney, Haley’s appeal to Democrats may‍ be‌ limited, as‌ her association with the Jan. 6 Committee investigations soured her image among Democrats.

In ⁣the end, Haley’s ‍comparison⁢ to Clinton may have been an attempt to appeal to a broader audience, but it⁤ did not resonate⁢ with Republican⁣ voters. ⁤Her campaign’s‍ reliance on ⁢identity politics ‌and⁣ crossover appeal proved to be ineffective. ⁢As the⁢ Iowa caucuses ⁤demonstrated, ⁢Haley is not the “Hillary‍ Clinton ⁢2.0” that ⁤some had claimed her to‌ be.


Read More From Original Article Here: Actual Republicans Want Nothing To Do With Nikki Haley

" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker