The Western Journal

Trump Delivers Devastating Financial Blow to Celebs Who Moved to UK to Escape Him

The article discusses former President Donald Trump’s recent proposal to impose a 100% tariff on films produced abroad, notably targeting the UK’s film industry, which he claims poses a threat to the American movie industry. Trump argues that Hollywood is suffering due to foreign competition adn incentives offered to filmmakers abroad. He expresses a desire to rejuvenate American filmmaking, emphasizing the importance of movies being produced in the U.S. and labeling the loss of industry to foreign countries as a national security concern. The UK, benefiting from tax relief policies for filmmakers, has become a favored location for major film productions, which has further fueled Trump’s concerns. While some might not see the decline of Hollywood as a national security issue, Trump’s broader point aligns with his governance’s criticism of trade practices that he believes harm American interests. The article illustrates Trump’s confrontational approach to international trade and cultural issues, viewing foreign film production as part of a larger problem of American industries being undermined by global competition.


While some of President Donald Trump’s tariff policies might take months to bear fruit, a few have paid immediate dividends.

Of course, the dividend in this case involves a generous helping of glee over the president’s treatment of nauseating celebrities.

Sunday on his social media platform , Trump announced that he would “begin the process of instituting a 100% Tariff on any and all Movies coming into our Country that are produced in Foreign Lands” — a measure targeting the United Kingdom, in particular, where government policy has fostered a burgeoning film industry, and to which several prominent Trump-hating celebrities have fled.

“The Movie Industry in America is DYING a very fast death. Other Countries are offering all sorts of incentives to draw our filmmakers and studios away from the United States. Hollywood, and many other areas within the U.S.A., are being devastated,” Trump wrote.

With that in mind, the president declared “a National Security threat” based on what he called “messaging and propaganda!”

“WE WANT MOVIES MADE IN AMERICA, AGAIN!” he concluded.

What a classic illustration of how Trump thinks and operates.

At first glance, the relative demise of Hollywood would hardly strike the average American as a “National Security threat.” No doubt Trump himself did not mean that in a literal sense.

More broadly, however, the theft of American industries does constitute a national security threat. Free-trade deals have hollowed out the American Heartland. For critical manufacturing, Americans have depended on China and other nations that employ slave or slave-like labor. Meanwhile, the establishment imported its own slave-like labor force in the form of illegal immigrants pouring across open borders. The entire Trump phenomenon emerged as a response to this betrayal of American citizens by their unworthy elected officials.

Thus, Trump’s urgent effort to rescue Hollywood makes sense in light of his major priorities.

And Hollywood needs rescuing thanks to the efforts of British officials, for which one can hardly blame them.

In short, according to the business news outlet Marketplace, the British government attracts filmmakers by offering major tax relief. British officials established that system in 2007 and then extended it to “high-end television” five years later.

Tax relief, of course, does not represent a clear “cost.” After all, absent tax relief, many filmmakers would not have chosen to make their movies in the U.K. The economically illiterate, however, have insisted on framing that policy as a “cost.”

“There are positives in that more films are being made in the U.K. as a result of the relief,” Alex Dunnagan of the tax-monitoring organization Tax Watch told Marketplace in 2023.  “But it comes with a cost.”

“We’ve had ‘Quantum of Solace’ receiving 21 million pounds in tax relief. ‘Skyfall,’ 24 million pounds in tax relief. ‘Spectre,’ 30 million pounds in tax relief. And most recently, ‘No Time To Die,’ 47 million pounds in tax relief,” he added.

Those numbers, of course, represent hypothetical unpaid taxes rather than actual subsidies from taxpayers. One may argue about the fairness of offering tax relief to one industry and not to another. But no one can deny that tax relief constitutes a major incentive, in this case for filmmakers.

The British Film Institute does provide direct funding through a national lottery. Tax relief, however, represents the driving force behind the U.K.’s growing film industry.

Jurassic World: Rebirth,” the “most expensive movie ever made,” per The U.K. Guardian, set to debut in theaters this July, received a “reimbursement” of more than 89 million pounds on account of the fact that producers chose to make the film in the U.K.

In other words, the British tax-relief policy has worked. And Trump, true to form, has countered with a successful policy of his own.

Of course, one wonders if the president waited until celebrities relocated to the U.K. before dropping the proverbial hammer on them. Needless to say, a 100 percent tariff on British-made films would force filmmakers to think twice before abandoning the United States.

And that has always been Trump’s larger goal: At minimum, make everyone think twice before abandoning the United States.




Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker