Republican Governor Succumbs to Trans Agenda
Senior Military Officers and the Changing Landscape of Politics
In the past, senior officers in the U.S. military made a conscious effort to stay out of politics, focusing solely on protecting the country from foreign threats. This mindset was the norm, as getting involved in domestic conflicts could lead to a destabilized nation. However, times have changed, and leaders like George Marshall are becoming increasingly rare in the Pentagon. Instead, individuals like Colonel Bree Fram have taken their place. Fram, a member of the Space Force, has gained attention for his advocacy for trans activists and his penchant for dressing up as a woman.
Recently, Fram headlined a forum sponsored by Fortune Magazine, where he argued that major corporations and the military must hire more crossdressers for the sake of inclusion and national security. Despite the lack of logical reasoning behind his claims, Fram’s promotion by the Pentagon indicates their support for his propaganda.
“Inclusion is a national security imperative,” @SpaceForceDoD’s Lt. Col. Bree Fram (@BFram3) tells #FortuneMPW.
“We can’t leave that talent that’s going to revolutionize business behind.” https://t.co/hAdZBAPjCx pic.twitter.com/z8a7lZqKYZ
— Fortune MPW (@FortuneMPW) October 11, 2023
Contrary to Fram’s claims, it is not the trans activists who fear speaking up, but rather those who recognize the reality that dressing up or undergoing surgeries does not change one’s biological identity. These individuals are afraid to voice their opinions due to the risk of losing their jobs. This self-censorship poses a significant threat to national security, as defending a nation requires living in reality.
Trans-identified individuals, who suffer from higher rates of mental illness, pose a greater risk to the military. Additionally, many of these activists hold disdain for the country and its values, further jeopardizing national security. Yet, individuals like Fram insist that speaking out against these realities endangers national security.
WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show
Fram’s activism extends beyond advocating for trans rights. He openly criticizes state legislatures that pass bills unfavorable to trans activists. This includes sharing memes on social media and condemning legislation that conservative voters overwhelmingly support.
It is unacceptable for a senior military officer to publicly condemn legislation and push their political agenda. The military’s role is to protect the nation, not to engage in politics. Unfortunately, it seems that Republicans have not taken a stand against Fram’s actions, allowing him to continue his activism unchallenged.
Furthermore, Ohio Governor Mike DeWine recently vetoed a bill that would have prohibited doctors from prescribing cross-sex hormones and puberty blockers to children. The bill also aimed to prevent boys from participating in girls’ sports. Despite overwhelming support for the bill in the Ohio House and Senate, DeWine disregarded the will of the people and vetoed it.
During a press conference, DeWine justified his decision by claiming that parents and medical experts agree that these procedures are medically necessary. However, this argument fails to consider the moral implications of permanently altering a child’s body. DeWine’s trust in parents and doctors overlooks historical instances of medical abuse, such as lobotomies, which were once considered acceptable.
DeWine’s reasoning becomes even more perplexing when he admits that there is no evidence to suggest that sterilizing children improves their well-being. Yet, he supports legalizing procedures that will sterilize children, disregarding the lack of scientific justification. This decision is both ghoulish and illogical.
One possible explanation for DeWine’s actions is the campaign contributions he receives from organizations that perform these procedures. However, this corruption does not fully explain the broader trend within the Republican establishment of capitulating to the demands of the LGBT lobby. Governors across the country have vetoed bills aimed at protecting children’s well-being and preserving fairness in sports.
If the conservative establishment wants to maintain any credibility, they must address the issue of senior military officers engaging in political activism and explain why they are ignoring the concerns of their constituents. It is time to hold these leaders accountable and put an end to their cowardice.
How does the Pentagon’s support for activists like Bree Fram indicate a shift in the military’s role?
Ave a point, as the Pentagon’s support for Fram’s activism indicates a shift in the military’s role. Instead of focusing solely on defending the country, senior officers are now using their positions to promote social and political agendas.
It is concerning that individuals like Bree Fram are becoming the face of the military. With his provocative behavior and public advocacy, he undermines the military’s credibility and professionalism. The military should be a symbol of strength, discipline, and unity, not a platform for individuals to push their personal agendas.
Furthermore, by promoting activists like Fram, the Pentagon is alienating a significant portion of the population. Many Americans hold traditional values and beliefs and view the military as a beacon of those values. When senior officers openly promote controversial and divisive issues, it erodes the trust and support of these individuals, risking the military’s image and effectiveness.
The changing landscape of politics within the military is not limited to debates around trans rights. In recent years, there have been instances of military leaders publicly criticizing political leaders, engaging in partisan politics, and endorsing candidates. These actions undermine the military’s apolitical nature and raise questions about the appropriateness of senior officers using their platform for political purposes.
To maintain the integrity and effectiveness of the U.S. military, senior officers must return to their traditional role of staying out of politics. Their primary responsibility should be protecting the country and its citizens, not pushing personal beliefs or agendas. The military should represent all Americans, regardless of their political views, and should be focused on maintaining readiness and security.
It is time to reevaluate the involvement of senior military officers in politics. The role of the military is too important to be overshadowed by personal agendas. Only by returning to a tradition of apolitical professionalism can the military regain the trust and support of the American people.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Auto Amazon Links: Could not resolve the given unit type, . Please be sure to update the auto-insert definition if you have deleted the unit.