oann

Michael Cohen confesses to unintentionally submitting fraudulent, AI-generated case citations


Donald Trump’s former lawyer and “fixer” Michael Cohen ⁢arrives at Trump’s civil fraud trial at New York State Supreme⁣ Court on October 24, 2023 in New York City. (Photo by ⁣Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

OAN’s Michaelangelo Hernandez
5:15 PM – Friday, December 29, 2023

Former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen ⁣was caught red handed and admitted to giving his ​lawyer AI generated legal citations he obtained by using Google Bard while filing to have his⁣ probation shortened.

Advertisement

In ‍ court ​filings unsealed on Friday, Cohen admitted to using the AI program ⁤after the court threatened to sanction his counsel, ⁤David Schwartz, upon finding out the cases referenced in his ‍request‌ files did not ⁣exist.

Cohen said he had not ​kept up with “emerging⁢ trends”‌ and the ⁢risks ⁤that come with‌ using AI software. He added that he trusted his lawyer to “vet” any suggestions he made prior to filing.

“As a non-lawyer, ​I have not ⁤kept up with emerging trends (and related risks) in legal technology ⁤and did not⁤ realize that Google ​Bard was a ​generative text service that, like Chat-GPT, could ‍show citations and descriptions⁤ that ⁤looked real but actually were not,” Cohen said.⁤ “Instead, I ‍understood it to be a super-charged search​ engine and had repeatedly used it in other contexts ⁣to (successfully) find accurate information online.”

This ‌is not the first time that the disgraced ex-lawyer has had a run in with ⁢the​ law. In 2018, Cohen pleaded guilty to tax evasion for his alleged part in arranging payouts for Stormy ‍Daniels and‌ Karen McDougal in order ⁤for them ⁢to ⁣keep their “reported relationship with ⁤the former president a secret.”

In his​ punishment, Cohen served a three-year‍ prison sentence.‌ He is currently in the middle of his​ three-year term of supervised release.‌

Cohen used to have a close relationship‌ with his former ‌client Donald Trump. However, their ‍relationship became bitter when Cohen shifted positions, becoming a ‌key witness in the Manhattan criminal trial that targeted⁣ the Republican⁢ president.

Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly ‌to ​your ‌inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts

Share this post!

San​ Antonio police are hoping new evidence will lead to answers over the killing of a pregnant teen and ⁤her boyfriend.

Recent reports reveal the ‘National Instant Criminal Background Check System’⁤ of the FBI holds records of⁣ nearly 14⁢ million ⁢illegal immigrants in the​ system.

Hamas’ ‍weaponization of sexual violence against Israeli women⁢ since October 7th⁣ is only a glimpse into how its sponsor, the Islamic ⁢Republic of Iran, has abused woman for⁢ decades.

As we quickly approach 2024, the U.S.⁤ is gearing up ⁣for what ‍many are calling an election year like no other.

December⁢ 22, 2023‌ – 6:05 AM PST ⁢HONG KONG (Reuters) ​– ​Chinese‌ regulators announced on Friday a⁤ wide range of ⁢rules aimed…

One of the main​ bottlenecks for Tesla ⁢is the speed ‍it can make the⁢ 4680 batteries used in the Cybertruck with ‌its new dry-coating technology.

A ‌group of 11 nonfiction authors have ⁢joined a lawsuit in Manhattan federal ⁣court ⁤that accuses⁣ OpenAI and Microsoft of misusing books the authors have written to train⁣ their⁢ models.

San Francisco ​police Sergeant David ​Radford ⁢contacted ⁣Tesla about data on an alleged stalker’s remote access to​ a vehicle.

rnrn

What are the risks and concerns associated ⁤with⁢ using AI-generated legal citations, as highlighted by Michael Cohen’s case?

Href=”https://www.google.com”>https://www.google.com

What ⁣is ⁤Google Bard?

Google Bard is an AI-powered text generation service developed by Google. It​ is designed to generate human-like text, including ​legal citations and descriptions, to aid users in their research. The program uses advanced algorithms and natural language processing techniques to provide accurate and relevant information.

The⁢ Issue​ with AI-generated Legal Citations

The use of⁣ AI-generated​ legal citations poses certain risks, as highlighted by​ Michael Cohen’s recent ⁤admission. While​ these⁢ citations ⁣may appear‍ legitimate and convincing, they can ‌be misleading and inaccurate. This can have serious implications in legal proceedings,⁢ compromising the⁣ integrity of‍ the‍ court⁢ system ⁤and potentially ‌leading to unjust outcomes.

Cohen’s case⁣ serves as ⁣a cautionary tale, demonstrating the importance of staying informed about emerging technological trends, ​especially in the legal field. It is crucial for legal professionals to thoroughly vet any information obtained through AI software⁢ to ensure ‌its authenticity ⁣and ‌reliability.

The Role of Lawyers in Verifying AI-generated Content

Lawyers have a responsibility to verify ⁤the‌ accuracy of⁢ any content they⁢ submit to the court. While AI-powered tools ​can ⁣be useful in legal research, they should not be solely relied upon. It⁢ is essential for lawyers to exercise due ​diligence by cross-referencing information obtained from AI software with reliable sources and conducting comprehensive legal analysis.

Michael Cohen’s reliance on Google Bard without fully understanding its limitations highlights the ‌need for enhanced ⁤education and guidance‍ in the legal⁣ profession regarding the ‌use ‌of⁣ AI tools. Lawyers⁢ should be‍ equipped with the knowledge and ​skills necessary to make informed ‍decisions when incorporating AI technology into their practice.

Lessons Learned and ​Moving‌ Forward

The revelation of Michael ‍Cohen’s use of AI-generated legal citations ⁤is a wake-up call for​ the legal community. It underscores the importance ‌of​ staying updated on technological⁤ advancements and their potential implications in the legal field.

As AI continues to play a growing role in various⁢ industries, including law, it is crucial for legal professionals to embrace these advancements responsibly. This​ requires a balance between leveraging the benefits of AI⁤ technology while also being diligent in⁤ verifying the accuracy and integrity‍ of AI-generated content.

Moreover,‍ policymakers​ and regulatory ⁤bodies must​ address the use ‍of AI in the legal profession and establish ‌guidelines and ethical standards to ensure its proper‌ and ‌responsible utilization. This will⁢ help safeguard ​the integrity of the legal system and maintain⁣ public trust in the legal ⁣profession.

Conclusion

Michael⁢ Cohen’s admission of‍ using⁢ AI-generated legal citations ​brings attention to the potential risks and challenges associated with the use of AI technology in the legal ‍field. While AI can be a valuable ⁢tool, it should‍ not​ replace the critical thinking⁤ and expertise of legal professionals.

The legal community must seize this opportunity to⁢ reflect upon the implications of AI and develop appropriate frameworks to ensure ‌its responsible use. By embracing AI technology while maintaining the ⁢highest standards ⁢of legal practice,​ lawyers can⁣ enhance their capabilities and deliver justice more effectively.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker