Michael Cohen submitted fabricated AI-generated cases to court through his lawyer
Former Trump Attorney Admits to Using AI Program for Fake Court Citations
In a surprising turn of events, former Trump attorney Michael Cohen has confessed to inadvertently including three nonexistent cases in a court filing. The revelation came after Cohen used the artificial intelligence program Google Bard to generate citations, which turned out to be completely fabricated.
Cohen’s lawyer, David Schwartz, unknowingly used these phony citations in a letter to a New York federal court, requesting an early termination of Cohen’s supervised release. The judge, unable to locate the mentioned cases, ordered Schwartz to explain why he should not face sanctions for submitting false information.
According to Cohen’s unsealed statement, he was unaware that Google Bard was a generative text service capable of producing realistic-looking citations that were actually fake. Cohen, who had been disbarred as a lawyer, attributed the incident to his lack of knowledge about emerging trends in the legal world.
Surprisingly, Cohen had previously used Google Bard as a “supercharged search engine” and had found accurate information. He expressed his shock that Schwartz, a longtime friend and attorney, did not question the authenticity of the cases before submitting them to the court.
Both Cohen and Schwartz have apologized to the court for their oversight, with Schwartz admitting that he failed to review what he believed was research conducted by another attorney. Despite the mistake, Cohen referred to it as an “honest mistake” and emphasized his surprise that Schwartz did not verify the existence of the cases.
Background on Cohen’s Legal Situation
Michael Cohen has been under court supervision since 2021, following his release from a three-year prison sentence for tax evasion and illegal campaign contributions.
It remains to be seen how the court will respond to this revelation and whether any further consequences will be imposed on Cohen and Schwartz.
Read more: The Washington Examiner
How can the legal profession maintain the credibility and integrity of the legal system while incorporating AI technology into their practice?
Ent court citations in a legal pleading due to his use of an artificial intelligence (AI) program. This admission has sparked a heated discussion surrounding the validity and reliability of AI in the legal profession.
Cohen, who served as Donald Trump’s personal attorney and ‘fixer’ for a decade, recently admitted to the Southern District of New York that he had mistakenly included three nonexistent court citations in a filing. These citations were generated by an AI program that Cohen had been using to streamline his legal work. The revelation has raised concerns about the potential risks and consequences of relying on AI technology in highly critical legal proceedings.
The rise of AI has undoubtedly brought significant advancements to various industries, and the legal field is no exception. AI programs have the capacity to automate tasks, enhance legal research, and improve case management. These benefits have led many professionals, including Cohen, to incorporate AI into their legal practices. However, this incident highlights the potential drawbacks and ethical dilemmas that can arise from relying too heavily on AI systems.
Legal professionals have a responsibility to thoroughly vet and verify the accuracy of any information they present to the court. Traditional methods of legal research involve thorough examination and cross-referencing of sources to ensure their legitimacy. However, with the emergence of AI technology, the temptation to rely wholly on machine-generated data can be enticing, ultimately undermining the very foundations of the legal profession.
While the intent behind using AI programs in legal work is often to increase efficiency and accuracy, it is crucial to remember that AI systems are only as reliable as the data they are fed. In the case of Cohen’s court citations, the AI program he employed failed to discern between legitimate and fabricated sources, resulting in the inclusion of nonexistent court decisions in a legal document. This error not only demonstrated a lapse in human judgment but also shed light on the limitations of AI systems’ ability to differentiate between credible and non-credible sources.
The implications of such mistakes are significant, as false or nonexistent legal citations can have severe repercussions on the outcome of a case. Fake citations could mislead judges, opposing counsels, and even influence judicial decisions. This raises concerns about the potential erosion of trust in the legal system and the fairness of proceedings.
The incident involving Cohen’s use of AI for fake court citations calls for a reevaluation of how AI programs are integrated into legal practice. While AI technology has the potential to be a valuable tool, it should not be seen as a substitute for human judgment and analysis. Legal professionals must exercise caution when incorporating AI into their work, taking on the responsibility to verify the accuracy and authenticity of AI-generated information.
In response to this incident, legal bodies and regulatory authorities should consider introducing strict guidelines and standards for the use of AI systems in legal proceedings. These guidelines should require legal professionals to verify and authenticate the data provided by AI programs independently. Additionally, transparency measures should be in place to ensure that any AI algorithms used in the legal sector are auditable, allowing for accountability and detection of potential errors or biases.
Furthermore, legal professionals should receive appropriate training and education on the usage and limitations of AI systems. They must understand the risks associated with relying solely on machine-generated data and be equipped with the skills to critically evaluate and validate the information provided by AI programs.
As technology continues to advance, it is essential to strike a balance between the advantages offered by AI and the careful application of human judgment in the legal profession. Utilizing AI technology can undoubtedly enhance efficiencies; however, it should not come at the expense of compromising the credibility, integrity, and fairness of the legal system. The incident involving Cohen’s use of an AI program for fake court citations serves as a stark reminder of the potential pitfalls and ethical implications associated with the integration of technology in the legal field.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
