Washington Post columnist reluctantly acknowledges truth about Jack Smith’s prosecution of Trump
Washington Post Columnist Can’t Help but Admit the Truth About Jack Smith’s Prosecution of Trump
Anyone with a shred of objectivity and clear eyes should be able to see the current legal entanglements of former President Donald Trump for what they actually are: politicized, spurious and weaponized charges meant to hamstring the chief political rival of the incumbent.
Due in no small part to the murky legal footing his opponents appear to be standing on, Trump has thus far avoided the political “kill shot” that his critics are so desperately pining for.
That desperation is starting to show, however, as even Biden’s stalwart allies at The Washington Post are beginning to question the true agenda of special counsel Jack Smith.
Questioning the True Agenda
- Trump is facing a quartet of charges, including conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding, and conspiracy against rights.
- Smith has been relentlessly pursuing any way to catch Trump, even resorting to using his phone data from January 6th.
- The primary focus of Smith’s case is the charge that Trump attempted to illegally overturn the 2020 general election results.
Post contributor Jason Willick penned a Tuesday opinion piece that all but called out the naked biases of Smith … and it’s about time.
In an opinion piece titled “Politics are now clearly shaping Jack Smith’s Trump prosecution,” (again … duh), Willick pointed out a pair of instances that suggested the special counsel was beginning to jump the shark.
Jumping the Shark
- Willick highlights the vague laws being applied in untested ways in Smith’s case against Trump.
- Smith’s recent move to expedite the trial against Trump by taking a filing to the Supreme Court raises eyebrows.
- Smith’s actions suggest a political timetable is driving his prosecution of Trump.
Willick eventually concluded his piece with a sobering realization: “The special counsel is an aggressive political actor seeking a political outcome as much as a legal one. The fiction that he is anything else is outliving its usefulness.”
Seeking a Political Outcome
- Smith’s actions demonstrate that he is more interested in crippling Trump than pursuing justice.
- The attempt to expedite the trial shortly before the 2024 general election reveals the left’s agenda.
- The Washington Post’s critical piece further supports the growing realization of Smith’s true intentions.
The post Washington Post Columnist Can’t Help but Admit the Truth About Jack Smith’s Prosecution of Trump appeared first on The Western Journal.
To what extent does targeting Trump and tarnishing his legacy through prosecution reflect the political rivalry and efforts to maintain power and prevent his potential comeback
Btain the election by pressuring state officials to overturn the results. However, as the evidence presented thus far has shown, there is little substance to support this claim. The conversations between Trump and state officials have not demonstrated any explicit or implicit threats or coercion. Rather, they appear to be discussions about the concerns and potential irregularities surrounding the election. It seems that Smith is grasping at straws in an attempt to validate his investigation and justify the resources being dedicated to it.
The case against Trump is not just a legal battle, but a reflection of the broader political climate and the lengths some are willing to go to suppress dissenting voices and maintain control. It serves as a cautionary tale for those who dare to challenge the establishment and the consequences they may face. As citizens, we must question the motives and actions of those in positions of power. We must demand transparency, fairness, and accountability in our legal system to ensure that justice is not tainted by political agendas or personal vendettas. The truth about Jack Smith’s prosecution of Trump is becoming increasingly evident, even to those who may have initially supported it. It is a politically driven effort to neutralize a powerful opponent and undermine the democratic process. As concerned citizens, we must remain vigilant and demand a system that upholds the principles of justice and fairness for all.Politicized and Weaponized Charges
The Political Rivalry
A Cautionary Tale
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...