Nationwide movement against ‘fat phobia’ gains momentum
Outlawing “Fat Phobia”: The Movement to Redefine Fear
In a quiet revolution, a movement has been brewing in our country to banish the concept of “fat phobia” - the fear of fat people. But let’s be clear, this so-called ”phobia” is a misnomer. No one is truly afraid of fat individuals, just as no one is afraid of those who identify as transgender. The real fear lies in the consequences of being overweight – the risk of heart disease and premature death.
However, this fear does not extend to a fear of others who are overweight. It’s understandable that many Americans have an aesthetic aversion to extreme obesity. Humans, for biological reasons, value physical fitness and have a preference for traditional gender appearances. These are natural inclinations that cannot be outlawed without erasing our humanity.
Yet, it seems that erasing humanity is precisely the goal. Earlier this year, fat activists in New York City successfully campaigned for a law that prohibits weight-based discrimination. This means that any employer who terminates a fat employee can expect an investigation from the city’s Commission on Human Rights. The activists want to fill every gap and reshape society to accommodate the morbidly obese.
The Battle Against “Fat Phobia” Spreads
The fight against “fat phobia” is gaining momentum beyond New York City. Even Colorado, known as the thinnest state in the nation, is on the verge of passing a law against weight-based discrimination. This would be the first statewide law of its kind in decades. Other states like Vermont, Massachusetts, and New Jersey are also considering similar legislation.
Ironically, Colorado, by the activists’ own standards, needs these protections the least. Their obesity rate is relatively low compared to the rest of the country. Yet, they are about to face new regulations to accommodate the morbidly obese.
The Absurdity of “Fat Phobia” Claims
The push against “fat phobia” is based on questionable data. For instance, a study cited by the Washington Post, using data from 1979, claims that a woman’s hourly pay can decrease by almost 2% for every one-unit increase in BMI. This narrative of fat discrimination in the workplace is far-fetched and lacks credibility. If it were true, many Americans would owe money to their employers for simply showing up to work.
Despite the absurdity, laws against “fat phobia” continue to gain traction. Landlords may soon be prohibited from denying rentals based on weight limits, and workplaces will be required to provide accommodations for overweight individuals.
As the battle against ”fat phobia” rages on, it’s crucial to question the motives behind these laws and the impact they will have on our society. Will they truly promote health and well-being, or will they simply enable unhealthy lifestyles? Only time will tell.
Engaging Paraphrase:
So here’s the deal: the law says that workplaces and buildings should make accommodations for overweight individuals. But let’s be real, that explanation raises some interesting questions. Like, how big do you have to be to exceed the weight limit for an apartment building? And what exactly are these “accommodations” that workplaces are supposed to make for fat people?
Finding answers to these questions isn’t easy, but if you dive into social media, you’ll stumble upon some intriguing proposals. Remember that TikTok video that went viral a few weeks ago? It featured Jaelynn Chaney, a travel and lifestyle creator, who had some pretty bold demands.
Fat Activists’ Demands:
- Raze every hotel and restaurant in the United States and rebuild them with super-wide hallways, spacious bathrooms, and elevators.
- Remove chairs with armrests in rooms and common areas, making life less comfortable for everyone else.
- Force airlines to provide extra free seats for obese individuals, disregarding the discomfort caused to non-obese passengers.
- Redesign office spaces to include furniture that accommodates fat people, avoiding tight corners and chairs with rigid armrests.
These demands may sound extreme, but they are gaining traction. In fact, some cities and institutions are already bending over backward to meet them. For instance, in London, ads featuring attractive women in swimsuits were banned from public transit due to public outcry. And the University of Illinois Chicago proposed banning the word “obesity” altogether, claiming weight discrimination is one of the few forms of discrimination society condones.
But let’s face the truth here. Most of these alleged discrimination cases against the obese are exaggerated or downright ridiculous. Even if some discrimination exists, it pales in comparison to discrimination based on race. Obesity is a choice, a consequence of one’s lifestyle. If you find yourself weighing 500 pounds and feeling discriminated against, it’s time to take responsibility and make changes for your own health.
Unfortunately, obese individuals have become the latest victim group in America. Yet, unlike other victim groups, they are victims of their own behavior. The fat acceptance movement, in many ways, mirrors other faux-victimhood movements. But it stands out as the most farcical example of our “me-first” society. Their demand to rearrange the world to accommodate the morbidly obese is simply absurd.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP
Instead of expecting society to change, a more reasonable approach would be for the morbidly obese to make lifestyle changes. But that requires personal effort, willpower, and sacrifice. And in our self-centered age, that’s not acceptable. We live in a time where the self reigns supreme, demanding that the world cater to its every whim. Unfortunately, this leads to self-serving laws that harm the very people they claim to help. When individuals become gods whose desires override the greater good, society crumbles.
We’ve witnessed this confusion for quite some time now. A decade ago, New York banned large sodas to promote healthier lifestyles. Now, they’re pushing for acceptance of obesity as natural and healthy. It’s a never-ending cycle of contradictory policies that only contribute to decay and collapse.
The Power of Choice
The true power lies in granting individuals the ability to make their own decisions. This encompasses the freedom to indulge in excessive eating and drinking, but more significantly, it encompasses the freedom to voice criticism towards those who partake in such behavior.
How does the movement to outlaw “fat phobia” neglect the importance of personal responsibility for one’s health and well-being?
And facing discrimination, it’s time to take a long hard look in the mirror and evaluate your own choices and habits.
Furthermore, the idea that society should cater to the needs and demands of the morbidly obese is not only unreasonable but also promotes unhealthy lifestyles. Obesity is a health issue, and it is important for individuals to take responsibility for their own well-being. Instead of enabling unhealthy habits, society should focus on promoting education and resources for individuals to make healthier choices.
The Thin Line Between Acceptance and Encouragement:
Supporters of the movement to outlaw “fat phobia” argue that it is about promoting acceptance and inclusivity. While accepting individuals for who they are is important, it is also crucial to encourage and promote healthy habits. Outlawing “fat phobia” without addressing the underlying health issues only enables unhealthy behaviors.
It is possible to support and accept individuals without negating the importance of health. Society should strive to create an environment that promotes body positivity and encourages individuals to take care of their physical well-being.
A Balanced Approach:
The movement to outlaw ”fat phobia” raises important questions about how society should approach issues of weight and health. It is essential to find a balanced approach that acknowledges the importance of acceptance and inclusivity while also promoting healthy lifestyles and choices.
Outlawing ”fat phobia” without addressing the health risks associated with obesity does a disservice to individuals struggling with their weight. Providing support and resources to help individuals make healthier choices should be the focus, rather than simply shifting the blame onto society for not accepting them as they are.
Conclusion:
The movement to outlaw “fat phobia” may seem well-intentioned, but it fails to address the underlying health issues associated with obesity. Rather than focusing on enabling unhealthy habits and demanding accommodations, society should prioritize education, resources, and support to help individuals make healthier choices.
Acceptance and inclusivity are important, but they should not come at the cost of ignoring the potential health risks of obesity. Striking a balance between acceptance and encouragement for healthier choices is key in promoting overall well-being.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Auto Amazon Links: Could not resolve the given unit type, . Please be sure to update the auto-insert definition if you have deleted the unit.