Hunter Biden’s lawyers resort to desperate tactics in battling firearm allegations
Hunter Biden’s Attorneys Fight to Dismiss Gun Charges
Hunter Biden’s legal team has launched a series of motions in an effort to have the gun charges against President Joe Biden’s son thrown out. One motion argues that the collapsed plea deal from July is still valid, according to Fox News.
The charges Hunter Biden currently faces include making false statements in the purchase of a firearm, making false statements related to information required by a licensed firearms dealer, and possession of a firearm while being an unlawful user of a controlled substance.
These charges came after a diversion agreement that was part of the original plea deal to settle gun and tax charges fell apart. Hunter Biden’s attorney, Abbe Lowell, argued in a filing that the indictment should be dismissed because it violates the existing diversion agreement.
“The Court should require the prosecution to honor its agreement and dismiss the Indictment.”
According to CNN, the agreement that fell apart in July was never signed by a court probation officer. U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika will determine the validity of the diversion agreement, which could potentially dismiss the gun charges.
Hunter Biden’s attorneys also claim that his prosecution is politically motivated, blaming former President Donald Trump. They argue that Trump’s influence led to the charges being filed. The filing states, “Mr. Trump is ground zero for improper motive.”
The attorneys are also challenging the appointment of special counsel David Weiss, claiming that he was not properly appointed, according to The Washington Post.
In another motion, Hunter Biden’s legal team argues that the charges against him are unconstitutional and violate the agreement made with the U.S. Attorney. They assert that the charges should be dismissed due to court rulings undermining the constitutionality of the law in question and partisan attacks by Trump and his allies.
“This is not how an independent investigation is supposed to work, and these charges should be dismissed,” Lowell stated.
Read More: Hunter Biden’s Attorneys Make Desperation Move to Fight Gun Charges
Source: The Western Journal
What concerns are raised by Hunter Biden’s attorneys regarding the legality of the search warrant, and why do they argue that any evidence obtained as a result of the search should be suppressed?
Ion agreement and that the court should be bound by the prior agreement.
According to the motion filed by Hunter Biden’s legal team, the collapse of the plea deal was not due to any fault of Hunter Biden, but rather because the government was unable to fulfill its obligations under the agreement. The motion argues that Hunter Biden held up his end of the deal and abided by all the terms and conditions set forth in the agreement, making it unfair and unjust to hold him accountable for the charges.
Furthermore, the motion also challenges the legality of the search warrant that led to the discovery of the alleged illegal possession of a firearm by Hunter Biden. Hunter Biden’s attorneys argue that the search warrant was obtained based on false and misleading information provided to the court, and therefore any evidence obtained as a result of that search should be suppressed and not used against him in the case.
Hunter Biden’s legal team also raises concerns about the potential political motivations behind the charges. Given the high-profile nature of the case and the involvement of President Joe Biden’s son, there is a concern that the charges may be politically motivated and designed to tarnish the reputation of the Biden family. The motion argues that the court should consider these factors and dismiss the indictment accordingly.
In response to the motion, the government has argued that the collapsed plea deal does not negate the validity of the indictment, and that the court should move forward with the case. They argue that the charges against Hunter Biden are based on substantial evidence and that the search warrant was obtained lawfully.
The outcome of this legal battle will have significant implications not only for Hunter Biden but also for the Biden administration. If the motions to dismiss are successful, it could potentially weaken the case against Hunter Biden and undermine the credibility of the government’s prosecution. On the other hand, if the court rejects the motions and proceeds with the case, it could lead to a highly publicized trial that could have political ramifications.
It is important to note that Hunter Biden is innocent until proven guilty, and the burden of proof lies with the government to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. As the legal proceedings unfold, it will be crucial for the court to carefully examine the arguments presented by both sides and make a decision based on the merits of the case.
In conclusion, Hunter Biden’s attorneys have launched a series of motions to dismiss the gun charges against him, arguing that the collapsed plea deal and the legality of the search warrant should be considered. This legal battle raises questions about the fairness and motivations behind the charges and could have significant implications for both Hunter Biden and the Biden administration. As the case continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how the court will rule on these contentious issues.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
