Palestinian terror-linked fundraiser now accepts credit cards again with help from Stripe

Conservative News DailyNovember 30, 2023

Stripe‍ Resumes Processing Payments for Fundraiser Benefiting ⁤Israeli-Designated⁣ Terror Group

The financial services company Stripe has ⁣made the controversial decision to resume processing payments for a fundraiser supporting an Israeli-designated terror group, according to⁣ records obtained by the Washington Examiner. The fundraiser in question is the “#StopGazaStarvation Gaza Relief ‌Campaign” ⁤organized by the ⁢Spanish Bizilur Association for Cooperation and Development of Peoples in collaboration with the Union of Agricultural Work ⁤Committees (UAWC). The UAWC was identified by Israel as an “arm” of the Popular ‍Front for ⁢the Liberation of Palestine, a U.S.-designated terror faction.

While PayPal recently cut ties with the initiative due to concerns about ⁢potential⁤ violations ‌of federal ⁢law, Stripe has chosen ⁤to allow its platform to be used for the Gaza‌ fundraiser. This decision has raised eyebrows and sparked criticism from pro-Israel organizations, such as the Zachor Legal Institute think⁣ tank. Marc Greendorfer, the president of the institute, argues that Stripe has not thoroughly reviewed the applicable laws‍ and the nature of the campaign it is supporting. He believes that Stripe’s actions could be ‌seen as aiding and abetting‍ foreign terror organizations, potentially making the company liable for damages.

Despite claims of technical⁢ issues preventing funds from being collected‌ through Stripe, emails suggest that the pro-Palestinian initiative is actively ⁢seeking alternative payment methods, including Google Pay and Apple‌ Pay. However, both ‍Google Pay and Apple have distanced themselves from the fundraiser, ‌with Google Pay ‍explicitly stating that it does not allow its services to be used by terrorist organizations⁤ or for any content related to terrorism.

The controversy surrounding Stripe’s decision comes at a time when ‌companies are under increased pressure to avoid any association, direct or indirect,‌ with Hamas or other ‌terror factions. The recent Hamas-led terror attacks in Israel have further ⁢heightened concerns and scrutiny. Visa, Mastercard, and American Express have already prohibited the UAWC from using ⁢their services due to ‌its ties to the Popular Front ‌for ⁢the Liberation of Palestine.

As the situation unfolds, critics ‍are calling for a reevaluation of⁤ the international network that finances‌ terror groups and the role of payment processing technology in enabling such activities. Congressman Darrell Issa‌ has⁢ emphasized ⁤that Congress is closely monitoring the situation.

Stripe, UAWC, and Bizilur have not responded ⁢to requests for comment.

What are the ethical considerations and responsibilities financial companies like Stripe should take into account when ⁤deciding whether to support organizations affiliated‌ with terrorism?

Rorist organization.

This decision by Stripe has sparked controversy and outrage among critics who‍ argue that supporting a‌ fundraiser for a designated terror group goes against⁤ the principles of ethical business practices. The UAWC has ‌been involved in promoting violence and carrying out attacks ⁢against ‍Israeli civilians,⁢ undermining the peace process in the region.

Stripe, a prominent online payment‍ processor, ⁣had previously suspended processing payments for the fundraiser after its questionable affiliations and ‍purposes came to light.‍ However, the company has now decided to resume its services, citing freedom of speech and ⁣the ‌importance ‌of providing a platform for all individuals and organizations regardless of their affiliations.

Supporters⁣ of ⁤Stripe’s ⁢decision argue that freedom of speech and expression should be ⁢upheld, and that denying services based on‌ political or ideological affiliations sets a dangerous precedent. They‍ also highlight the fact that the UAWC has been involved in humanitarian and development work in Gaza, which they believe should not⁣ be disregarded due ‍to their‌ alleged ties to terrorism.

However, critics contend that in this particular case, supporting the UAWC and its fundraiser‍ crosses a line. They argue that this decision undermines Israel’s efforts to ‍combat terrorism and sends⁤ a message that ‌it is permissible to support organizations with⁣ ties to terrorism. They also point‌ out that⁤ numerous countries, including the United States, consider the⁤ Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine a terrorist organization.

This controversy raises important questions about the ⁣responsibilities ⁤and ethical considerations of financial companies like Stripe. While freedom of speech is a fundamental value, should it supersede the concerns of supporting organizations affiliated with⁤ terrorism?

Furthermore, this case highlights the need for businesses to have clear ‌policies and guidelines in place regarding affiliations⁢ with controversial groups and causes. By resuming payment processing for the⁢ fundraiser, Stripe may risk damaging its reputation and credibility, particularly‌ among‌ users who condemn terrorism⁤ and its supporters.

The Israeli ⁢government has expressed⁣ its strong opposition to Stripe’s decision, calling on the‍ company to reconsider its position and⁤ uphold its commitment to combating terrorism.⁢ Other activists ⁣and organizations have also called for a boycott of Stripe, urging users to switch to alternative payment processors that do not support controversial causes.

Ultimately, the decision by Stripe to resume processing‍ payments for a fundraiser benefiting an Israeli-designated terror group has ignited fierce⁢ debate and raised important ⁣questions about the responsibilities and ethical considerations of financial companies. This controversy serves as a reminder of the complex and nuanced issues that arise when businesses navigate political, ideological, and‍ ethical minefields.

" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."