The daily wire

Coca-Cola removes BLM donations from website due to Hamas support.

The Coca-Cola Company ‍has quietly removed a mention on its website about donations to Black Lives Matter after the activist group expressed support ​for the Palestinian terror group Hamas. The deletion specifically refers to Sprite’s donations to⁢ Black⁢ Lives Matter. The removed sentence⁢ stated that Sprite had donated $500,000 to the Black Lives Matter Global Network to support voting education efforts and a program called Black Future Month, aimed ⁤at empowering‌ the next generation of Black youths. This sentence ⁣can be found in an archived version of Coca-Cola’s “Taking⁢ A Stand” webpage ⁢from June, but it is no longer present ⁤in the current version of the page. At the top of the page, Coca-Cola states its ⁢commitment to racial ​equity and using its voice and reach to take a stand. Senator Ted Cruz⁣ brought attention to Coca-Cola’s edit in a recent post, ‌demanding an apology from the company. The controversy arose after Black Lives Matter chapters expressed support⁣ for Palestinians, with ‌some⁤ appearing to support Hamas ‌directly. For example, ​Black Lives Matter Chicago posted an image of a ⁢paraglider ⁢with a Palestinian flag, ​along with ⁢the words‍ “I stand with Palestine.”⁢ Hamas had used paragliders in the past to ⁣carry ⁣out attacks on Israeli communities. Black Lives ⁢Matter​ Chicago also shared a cartoon‌ defending ‍Palestinian⁣ resistance against Israeli settlers. Similarly, Black Lives Matter Los Angeles posted on⁤ Instagram that the Palestinians’ resistance should not be⁢ condemned, as it is seen as a desperate act of self-defense against decades of apartheid and violence. ⁤Despite ‍the backlash, Black Lives⁤ Matter Los Angeles has not ⁢deleted their post.

How has the association between Black Lives Matter and⁢ Hamas impacted Coca-Cola’s decision to remove the mention of ⁤donations?

The Coca-Cola Company,⁢ a multinational beverage‍ corporation, recently⁢ caused a stir ⁣when it quietly removed a mention on its website about donations to Black Lives Matter. The decision came after the activist group expressed‌ its support ⁤for the Palestinian terror group, Hamas.

Specifically, ⁣the deletion referred to Sprite’s donations to Black Lives Matter. The removed sentence stated‌ that‍ Sprite had donated​ $500,000‍ to the Black Lives Matter Global Network, with the aim of supporting ⁢voting education ⁢efforts ⁢and a program called Black Future Month, which sought to empower the next generation of Black youths. ⁤Although this sentence could be found in an archived version of Coca-Cola’s “Taking a Stand” webpage from June, it ⁤is‌ no longer‌ present in the ⁣current version ⁢of the⁢ page.

At the top of the page, Coca-Cola boldly states⁢ its commitment to racial equity and its determination to use its voice and reach to take a stand. However, Senator ‌Ted ⁣Cruz drew attention to the company’s edit in a recent post, demanding an apology from Coca-Cola. The ⁣controversy arose after several Black ‍Lives Matter chapters⁤ expressed their ⁣support for Palestinians,⁢ with some seemingly endorsing Hamas directly.

For instance, Black Lives Matter Chicago posted an image of a paraglider holding a Palestinian flag, accompanied⁢ by the words “I stand with‍ Palestine.” This is noteworthy‍ because Hamas ‌has used paragliders in ⁤the past to ⁢carry out attacks on ​Israeli communities. Furthermore, Black Lives Matter Chicago shared a cartoon defending ​Palestinian resistance against Israeli settlers.

Similarly, Black Lives‍ Matter Los ‌Angeles took⁢ to Instagram and stated that ‌the Palestinians’ resistance should not be condemned as it is perceived as ⁢a desperate act of self-defense against decades of apartheid⁣ and​ violence. Despite facing backlash, Black Lives ‍Matter Los Angeles has chosen not to delete their⁤ post.

The association‌ between Black Lives Matter and Hamas has⁢ sparked a ​wave of controversy and led to the removal of Sprite’s ⁣donations to‌ the⁤ activist group from Coca-Cola’s website. While ⁤it is unclear whether this ⁣decision is directly linked to the support expressed by some ⁢Black Lives Matter chapters for Hamas, it ‌is⁢ evident that​ Coca-Cola wishes ‍to distance itself from any affiliation ​with a⁣ terror group.

Coca-Cola’s ​choice to delete​ the sentence ⁢regarding Sprite’s donations has reignited the ongoing⁣ debate around corporate‌ involvement in political and social ​issues. Critics argue that companies ​should⁣ remain neutral and refrain from engaging in contentious topics, while others ​believe that corporations⁢ have ​a responsibility to ⁣use their platforms​ to address⁢ systemic injustices ⁢and‍ promote positive social change.

As the discussion unfolds, it‍ remains to be seen ​whether Coca-Cola will address ⁤the controversy and provide⁤ further clarification on its decision. Regardless, this ​incident ‍serves​ as a reminder that the support expressed by individual chapters of an organization does not necessarily represent the views⁤ of the ​entire movement.

In‍ a highly polarized world, ‍where issues like‌ the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are rife with complexity,⁣ the intersection of corporate⁢ donations and political affiliations can be ⁤a challenging and nuanced terrain to navigate. Ultimately, these incidents prompt us ​to reflect on the power and influence of corporations in shaping‍ public discourse and the responsibility they bear in upholding their stated ⁢commitments to social equality‌ and justice.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker