No GOP frontrunner for Speaker before election.
Republicans Struggle to Unite in Speaker Nominee Debate
Republicans held a debate with their two candidates for speaker of the House on Oct. 10 and emerged after two hours no closer to identifying the nominee to unite the divided conference.
Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) and Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), both highly respected within the Republican conference, each spoke and responded to questions in the two-hour, closed-door session.
Attendees described the exchange as respectful and healthy but were not optimistic about quickly coming to an agreement on their next leader.
Related Stories
-
Pressure Mounts as Republicans Seek Unity in Electing House Speaker
10/10/2023 -
House GOP Races to Fill House Speakership Amid Israel–Hamas Conflict
10/9/2023
Asked about the chance of electing a nominee at their conference vote scheduled for 10:00 a.m. the next day, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) told reporters, “I’d say 2 percent.”
Both men have large bases of support among House Republicans, which can be traced to their lengthy tenure in House leadership.
“So much of this is personal relationships,” Rep. Kelly Armstrong (R-N.D.) told reporters after the forum. “People who serve on Jordan’s committee are very supportive of him. You have delegations, you have regional issues, you have people who have been here a long time … who know some of the historical tensions that exist.”
Difference, No Distinction
After the candidate forum, several Republican members noted little difference between the two.
Both would offer further support for the war in Ukraine only after seeing a clear strategy for victory from the White House. Both had plans for avoiding a government shutdown when the current continuing resolution expires on Nov. 17.
Mr. Jordan advanced a plan that included a longer-term continuing resolution with built-in spending cuts. Mr. Scalise favored passing conservative appropriations bills in the House and forcing the Senate to negotiate over them.
Both men were praised for their commitment to the Republican conference.
Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Michael McCaul (R-Texas) said, “There’s a very robust debate.” As to who would come out the winner, he said. “We’ll find out tomorrow.”
“A lot of people like Steve and a lot of people like Jim,” Rep. Troy Nehls (R-Texas) said. “I don’t know how you get to 218,” the number of votes needed to win the election.
The conference is so widely split at this point, according to Mr. Nehls, that if the vote went to a second or third ballot, Mr. McCarthy might come out ahead.
The Unity Problem
Many Republicans have said they favor voting among themselves until they arrive at a nominee they will all support before venturing into an election on the House floor.
Though they hold a majority in the House, it took 15 ballots to elect Mr. McCarthy in January as a number of Republicans held out for concessions from the would-be speaker. Most Republicans want to avoid a repeat of that spectacle.
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) floated the idea of beginning the process with secret ballots rather than a roll call vote. “I think we just need to see where everybody’s cards are and see what that first ballot indicates,” he said.
Others want to create a binding rule that would force all Republicans to support whichever candidate won a majority within the conference.
It’s doubtful that members would follow such a rule, even if passed. “I won’t do it,” Mr. Nehls said of the idea. “It’s a conference rule. It is not the House rule. “I’m just telling you, I won’t do it.”
Conference rules cannot prevent a member from voting his or her choice in the House, so there would be no mechanism for enforcing such a rule, according to Mr. Massie.
Although Mr. Scalise and Mr. Jordan are the only two candidates at the moment, that could change.
The Candidates
Both Mr. Scalise and Mr. Jordan are staunch conservatives. Both men supported objections to electoral college voting results when Congress met to certify Joe Biden’s election on Jan. 6, 2021.
Mr. Scalise, 57, has served in Congress since 2008. He has been involved in House leadership since 2013 when he chaired the Republican Study Committee, the largest of the five major Republican caucuses, before moving on to become majority whip and then majority leader. He is known as an effective fundraiser, a key responsibility as the party’s leader in the House.
Mr. Scalise has been criticized for speaking at a convention of white nationalists in 2002. Mr. Scalise said he was unaware of the group’s viewpoint when accepting the invitation.
“I have a proven track record of bringing together the diverse array of viewpoints within our Conference to build consensus where others thought it impossible,” Mr. Scalise wrote in a letter to colleagues announcing his candidacy.
“We have an extremely talented Conference, and we all need to come together and pull in the same direction to get the country back on the right track,” Mr. Scalise wrote. “Our strength as a Conference comes from our unity, and we have seen when we unite as a Conference, we can deliver wins for the American people.”
Mr. Jordan, 59, has served in Congress since 2007. He is a former college wrestling coach and state lawmaker in Ohio.
Mr. Jordan is a co-founder of the House Freedom Caucus, the most conservative of the five major Republican caucuses. He leads the Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government and has been outspoken about the need for congressional oversight of the executive branch.
Critics have pointed out that he stonewalled the House select committee that investigated the events of Jan. 6 when subpoenaed to testify.
“I think we are a conservative-center-right party. I think I’m the guy who can help unite that. My politics are entirely consistent with where conservatives and Republicans are across the country,” Mr. Jordan said in an interview with CNN.
House Republicans will reconvene Oct. 11 at 8:30 a.m. for a classified briefing on the crisis in Israel, and proceed with voting for their nominee later in the morning.
How important is it for the Republican party to have a strong and unified leadership in navigating critical issues such as the Israel-Hamas conflict and tensions with Russia and China?
E largest conservative caucus in the House. He currently serves as the Majority Leader, the second-highest position in the House Republican leadership. Mr. Scalise is known for his strong support of conservative policies and his ability to rally support within the Republican caucus.
Mr. Jordan, 58, has served in Congress since 2007. He is a founding member of the House Freedom Caucus, a group of conservative lawmakers who advocate for limited government and reduced spending. Mr. Jordan is known for being a vocal critic of the Democratic Party and for his staunch defense of former President Donald Trump. He has gained a loyal base of support within the Republican conference for his unwavering conservative principles.
Both candidates have a strong following within the Republican caucus, but their differences in leadership style and strategy have created a divide among members. Mr. Scalise’s approach is seen as more traditional and focused on incremental change within the system, while Mr. Jordan’s strategy is often viewed as confrontational and driven by ideological principles.
The challenge for Republicans is to find a candidate who can unite the divided conference and lead the party effectively. The role of the Speaker of the House is crucial in setting the agenda and guiding legislative priorities. Republicans are facing critical issues such as the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict and the rising tensions with Russia and China. It is essential for the party to have a strong and unified leadership to navigate these challenges.
The Speaker nominee debate on Oct. 10 did not provide a clear resolution to this problem. While the exchange between Mr. Scalise and Mr. Jordan was described as respectful and healthy, attendees expressed skepticism about reaching an agreement quickly. Rep. Thomas Massie’s comment about the likelihood of electing a nominee being only 2 percent reflects the sentiments of many members.
The lack of distinction between the two candidates was also noted by several Republican members. Both Mr. Scalise and Mr. Jordan share similar positions on issues such as the war in Ukraine and avoiding a government shutdown. They both have a
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...