Biden administration accused of bypassing Congress with new ‘sue and settle’ tactic.
The Biden Administration Accused of Circumventing Congress with “Sue and Settle” Scheme
The Biden administration is once again facing accusations of using a clever tactic to bypass Congress. Known as “sue and settle,” this scheme involves ideologically aligned nongovernment organizations suing one of the administration’s agencies. Surprisingly, the two sides then reach a settlement that conveniently favors their preferred outcome.
Critics argue that although these organizations and agencies appear to be adversaries in court, they are actually working together behind the scenes. This process allows them to change policies without any input from Congress or the public, which many view as undemocratic and a betrayal of the rule of law.
The most recent example of this tactic involves the Sierra Club and two federal agencies. In August, a court decision led to the National Marine Fisheries Service, a part of the Department of Commerce, agreeing to designate 6 million acres in the Gulf of Mexico as off-limits for future oil and gas leasing.
Additionally, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, a unit of the Interior Department, issued new guidelines for ships traveling in the habitat of the Rice’s whale. These guidelines included speed limits, nighttime travel bans, and orders to stay at least 500 meters away from the whales. Critics argue that these restrictions unfairly target fossil fuel extraction while exempting fishing ships and offshore wind facilities.
However, a federal judge overturned these restrictions on Thursday night, although the government is expected to appeal the decision. The judge criticized the process, stating that it resembled a weaponization of the Endangered Species Act rather than a collaborative and reasoned approach.
Conservatives have raised concerns about this tactic throughout President Biden’s time in office. The Trump administration vowed to end ”sue and settle” in 2017, claiming that the Obama administration had failed to defend itself against numerous lawsuits, resulting in a flood of new regulations. However, President Biden revoked the memo addressing this issue shortly after taking office.
Under the Biden administration, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has spent millions of dollars on attorney fees for settlements under various acts. In contrast, payouts were lower during the Trump and Obama administrations. The House Oversight Committee has criticized the EPA and Interior Department for incentivizing “sue and settle” schemes, describing them as a way for special interest groups to achieve their regulatory goals in secret, bypassing the legislative and regulatory processes.
It remains to be seen how this controversy will unfold, but it highlights the ongoing debate surrounding the Biden administration’s approach to policy-making and the role of Congress in shaping the nation’s laws.
What are the arguments of critics who claim that the sue and settle method employed by the Biden administration undermines the legislative process?
Ing to a settlement with the Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians. Under the settlement, the agency agreed to complete a review of protections for endangered species. This move was seen as a win for the environmental groups, as it could potentially lead to stronger protections for endangered marine species.
However, critics argue that this settlement is just another example of the Biden administration sidestepping the legislative process and imposing its own agenda. By allowing ideologically aligned organizations to sue government agencies, the administration can effectively dictate policy without Congressional approval or public input.
Supporters of the sue and settle method argue that it provides a way for organizations to hold government agencies accountable for implementing regulations and laws. They believe that this tactic is necessary when Congress is unable or unwilling to act. However, opponents argue that this approach undermines the checks and balances crucial to a democratic system. By circumventing Congress, the administration is essentially bypassing the will of the people and making decisions behind closed doors.
This is not the first time the sue and settle tactic has been used by a presidential administration. Similar accusations were leveled against the Obama administration, with critics arguing that it was a way for the executive branch to impose its agenda without proper Congressional oversight.
To combat this perceived abuse of power, some have called for reforms that would limit the sue and settle method. Proposals include requiring agencies to publicly disclose any settlements reached, allowing affected parties to intervene in the litigation process, and giving Congress more oversight over such settlements.
In response to the accusations, the Biden administration has defended its use of sue and settle, arguing that it allows for more efficient and effective policymaking. They maintain that it is a tool to ensure that government agencies are held accountable and that environmental protections are upheld.
However, the controversy surrounding the sue and settle tactic continues to stir debate. As the Biden administration faces scrutiny for its use of this method, the question remains whether it is a legitimate strategy to advance policy goals or an undemocratic way to bypass Congressional authority. Only time will tell if reforms will be implemented to address these concerns and restore transparency and accountability to the policymaking process.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...