Conservative News Daily

Reflecting on the 1980s, ‘Computerphobia’ was the precursor to AI-paranoia.

AI-Paranoia Is ‌Nothing New: Looking‍ Back at 1980s ‘Computerphobia’

Those who fear the consequences of artificial intelligence (AI) may take​ comfort in knowing that they have‌ plenty of company. New technologies always produce new anxieties.

Indeed, fretful souls in search of kindred spirits need look no ⁣deeper into history than the 1980s.

Those of​ us who entered adolescence during that “Morning in America” decade ⁤might have forgotten one‌ of its ironic ​phenomena: “computerphobia,” or the intense fear of ⁢personal computers, at⁢ that time still a new⁤ consumer product.

A 2015 article in The ‍Atlantic presented both quantitative and qualitative ⁣evidence of computerphobia’s reality.

On the quantitative side, an analysis of “computerphobia” references tracked by Google in⁤ books published ⁣between 1950 and 2015 showed near-zero results until the ​late ⁤1970s. Then, a dramatic‍ upward spike began around 1980 and peaked​ mid-decade.

Meanwhile, periodicals⁣ and newspapers picked up on the trend and addressed the new anxieties.

“The most important thing to remember‌ about computerphobia is that it’s a natural reaction to something unfamiliar,” ​associate editor Charles Rubin wrote in a ‍1983 issue of Personal Computing magazine.

And “don’t forget that ‌you’re in charge, not ⁣the computer,” Rubin added.

Small wonder ⁤that Arnold⁤ Schwarzenegger’s “The Terminator” topped the U.S. box office chart for two weeks‍ in 1984. A film whose⁤ premise involves a ⁣dystopian future of self-aware machines would resonate⁢ with computerphobes everywhere.

A “phobia,” of ⁣course, denotes something irrational, and sometimes we only​ detect‍ the irrationality in hindsight.⁤ Whatever ‌their defects, personal computers did not destroy human society in the ​1980s.

The question of what‌ drove ​the computerphobia phenomenon of that decade requires broadening our view enough to ⁣recognize‌ that‍ human beings⁣ have always maintained an ‌ambivalent relationship with technology.

In some cases, new developments have inspired reverent awe. Samuel Morse’s ⁤first commercial telegraph message in 1844, for instance, ⁤brought ​back a fitting‍ reply: “What Hath God Wrought?”

At other times, ignorance of the⁢ novelty has resulted in tragedy.⁢ At the‌ opening​ of the Liverpool ‌and Manchester Railway in 1830,⁣ prominent British statesman ​ William Huskisson, ⁣a member of Parliament for Liverpool and a former leader of the House of ‍Commons, ⁣showed his lack of‌ familiarity with the⁣ new technology when he failed to evade an oncoming locomotive. The ‌accident left‌ Huskisson’s legs⁢ mangled, and he died hours later.

Computerphobia involved fears less morbid but still unsettling.

According to the 1996 book “Women⁤ and Computers,” computerphobia ‌entailed “a range of resistances, fears, anxieties, and hostilities.” These included–perhaps most significantly–“feeling that you can be replaced by a machine.”

This particular anxiety​ has manifested⁤ most ‌often in the workforce, ⁢where machines ‍have seemed destined ‌to displace nearly everyone.

The good news on this⁤ front is that such anxieties have always existed, and they have always ​failed to materialize.

According to a 2015 ⁤article in The⁢ Guardian, for ⁣instance, technology has created ⁢far ⁣more‍ jobs than it has destroyed. In fact, based‌ on census data from England and Wales since 1871, a study ⁢conducted by economists at the ⁣British-based consulting firm Deloitte described technology, on balance, as a ⁤“great ‌job-creating machine.”

Jean Vilbert, Professor of Law and Economics ⁤in Sao Paolo, Brazil, made a similar ‍argument ⁢in a⁢ 2019 article published by the Foundation for Economic Education. Vilbert even cited the Deloitte study to show that jobs lost in one sector ‌reappear and multiply in another.

The occasion ⁤for‍ Vilbert’s article was speculation–rampant⁢ across 2019 headlines–that robots and AI soon ‍would eliminate human workers. ⁤Vilbert noted that⁢ Democratic presidential candidates Andrew Yang and⁣ Bill de Blasio had fueled these anxieties ⁢through anti-automation rhetoric.

“Machines will replace humans. Artificial intelligence will outpace ⁤people.‍ There will ‌be no jobs ‌for the poor. Chaos! ⁤Famine! Technology is casting‌ a shadow ⁣over ⁣the future.⁣ This is the current mainstream outcry—or could we say ​paranoia?” Vilbert wrote.

Computerphobia ⁢reminds us ‌that we have known such anxieties​ in the ⁣not-so-distant past.

The⁣ post AI-Paranoia ‌Is Nothing New: Looking Back at 1980s ‘Computerphobia’ appeared first on The Western Journal.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker