The epoch times

Michigan GOP calls criminal charges against Trump 2020 electors a “witch hunt.”

‌ ⁤ ​

⁤ ‍

⁤ ⁣

The Michigan‌ Republican ‍Party has issued a sharply⁤ critical reaction to ⁢the​ Michigan​ Attorney⁣ General’s decision ​to bring⁢ criminal ⁤charges ⁣against 16 people‍ who ⁢signed certificates⁤ claiming that‍ President⁣ Donald Trump won Michigan in⁤ the ⁢2020 election.

‌​ ⁢

“This‍ is a ​witch ​hunt designed​ to ⁢prosecute and ⁢punish​ citizens ⁤who are duly ​elected‍ and⁣ perform a major function‌ in⁤ presidential ​elections,”⁢ said Macomb ​County GOP ‍Chairman Mark‌ Forton at ⁤a⁢ July ‍19​ press conference in​ Lansing.

⁢ ⁤ ​

Mr. ⁣Forton’s ‌remarks pertain to ⁢Michigan⁤ Attorney General ⁣Dana Nessel’s announcement⁢ a day ⁣earlier of ‍multiple felony ‍charges ​against⁤ the⁤ 16 individuals whom ⁣she⁤ labelled as‌ “false electors.”

⁣ ‌ ⁣

The Michigan AG’s ⁤office said that the defendants ⁢met at the Michigan‌ Republican Party headquarters on Dec. 14, 2020, ⁢and signed their names on multiple certificates ⁤attesting to being the ​”duly elected ⁣and qualified electors” ⁣for ​President and⁢ Vice President⁤ of the ‌United ​States ⁢for⁣ the State ‍of⁢ Michigan.

​ ⁣

“That was‍ a‍ lie,” ⁤Ms. Nessel said⁢ at ⁣a press conference Tuesday. “They ‌weren’t the duly ⁢elected ‌and⁤ qualified​ electors and each of ⁤the defendants‍ knew it.”

​ ⁤

‌ ⁣ ⁤ ⁣ ​
​ ​⁣ ​ ⁣
⁤ ​ ‍ ‌

⁢ ⁣ ⁤​ ‌⁣ Michigan Attorney​ General Dana Nessel⁣ speaks‌ during⁣ a ​news conference‍ in ⁣Lansing, Mich.,⁢ on March 5, ⁣2020.‌ (David‌ Eggert/AP⁢ Photo)
​ ⁢​ ⁤

​ ⁤ ‌

The ⁣certificates⁣ that ⁤the 16 ⁤individuals signed ​were ⁢subsequently​ transmitted ⁣to‌ the U.S. Senate and⁤ the National Archives in what Ms. Nessel’s⁣ office described​ as a ‌”coordinated​ effort” ⁤to hand ⁢the state’s electoral votes to ​a different ⁤candidate than ⁣the⁣ one actually⁣ elected by⁤ the ​people‌ of ​Michigan.

‍ ⁢

“The‌ evidence ​will⁢ demonstrate ⁢there‍ was no​ legal authority for ​the ⁤false electors ‍to purport‌ to ‌act as ‘duly elected⁣ presidential‍ electors’ and execute⁢ the ‍false electoral documents,” Ms. ⁢Nessel⁣ said in‌ a​ statement.

‍ ‍ ⁣

Each⁢ of the accused faces ⁣multiple‍ felony counts ‌that in ‍total​ carry ​a maximum ⁤penalty of⁤ 85 years⁣ in prison.

​ ⁢

Mr. ⁢Forton⁣ disputed Ms. ‍Nessel’s ‍characterization of‌ the 16 ⁤accused as “false electors.”

​ ‌

“This current quest by ⁢the socialist Democrats​ to eliminate ‌the ‍[Electoral] College​ is now ⁢spilling over ​to⁤ criminally‌ attack a ‍group of ⁣16 legally​ elected electors on ‌the​ Republican⁣ side for​ the ‍2020 ‍election,” he⁢ said at​ the press ⁣conference.

​ ‌

“The 16 individuals under ⁤attack​ are not​ fake ⁤electors,” he‍ continued, ⁢adding ⁣that‍ they were ‍legally elected‍ under ⁣Michigan law ‍at convention to represent‌ the⁤ Republican ‌Party ‌as ⁢electors.

‍ ​ ⁢ ​

The ⁤Michigan AG’s ⁢office ⁢did⁢ not immediately ​respond‌ to a ​request ‌for comment. However, ⁣Ms. Nessel⁤ said‍ during a press ‍conference ⁢on ​Tuesday that she is​ expected⁢ to hear claims that ‍the ⁣prosecution ​is ​politically‌ motivated.

⁢ ⁣ ⁣

Michigan‌ Democrats, by⁣ contrast,⁤ praised ⁤Ms. Nessel’s decision⁣ to ​bring criminal‍ charges.

⁢ ‌ ⁣

“I am so⁣ grateful our ⁢attorney general stepped up and ‍issued⁣ charges‍ against these ‍folks,” ⁢said LaVora Barnes, the ⁤current‌ Chair ⁤of the Michigan‌ Democratic Party,⁣ per ⁤CBS.

“These⁤ Republicans ‌attempted to ⁤undermine the ‌very foundation⁤ of⁣ our democracy​ pretending⁣ they were⁤ indeed⁢ the duly ​elected⁤ electors knowing​ that ​they ⁣weren’t,” she​ continued. “It’s shocking ​to​ me ​that it happened ‍in the ⁢first place.”

‍ ⁣

Dueling Electors

⁣ ​

Following ⁣Mr. ⁤Trump’s⁤ claims​ of fraud ⁢in the 2020‍ presidential election, Republican⁣ electors ⁢in ​seven states—including Michigan—cast alternative ​slates of votes for Mr.‍ Trump.

⁣ ​ ⁤

Republicans‍ in ‍some ‌of​ the ‍states‌ said that​ the rationale for ⁤casting alternative slates of elector ​votes ⁢would‍ preserve Mr. Trump’s⁤ legal ⁣claim for⁣ the​ election as legal ‌challenges made ⁤their way through the⁣ courts.

​ ⁣

The idea ‌of ‌competing or ⁢dueling electors is ⁣not new​ in ​American ⁢politics,⁢ Mr. Forton pointed‍ out ‍in the press ⁤conference Wednesday.

​‌

“It’s ‌happened‌ many⁢ times ‌in American history by‌ both Democrats and Republicans in⁣ contested elections,” he said.

‍ ‌ ⁢

The precedent​ of ⁤dueling electors in ‌U.S. ⁢presidential elections ​was ‍also ‌put forward as an ⁤argument​ by Meshawn ⁣Maddock,⁣ former⁣ co-chair ⁢of the‍ Michigan‍ Republican Party,​ and ‍one of‌ the individuals⁤ involved.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker