The epoch times

Growing opposition to Biden Admin’s crackdown on dishwashers’ climate impact.

A coalition ‌of over‍ a dozen industry and consumer groups​ has‍ issued a scathing‍ criticism ‌of the Biden administration’s​ proposed regulatory crackdown‍ on‍ dishwashers as⁢ part ⁢of a ‌sweeping ​fight‌ against the perceived‌ dangers of climate change.

After‌ first​ aiming ⁣at gas⁢ stoves​ to ‌cut ‌greenhouse gases, the Biden ⁢administration has⁣ turned its attention to⁢ other home appliances, with​ dishwashers finding ⁤their ​way into ‍the⁢ crosshairs.

On May 5,​ the Department of ⁣Energy (DOE) proposed congressionally mandated standards for⁢ new dishwashers,⁢ claiming the move would reduce consumer costs while cutting the amount of​ carbon ‌emitted ⁢into the atmosphere.

The proposed ⁢rulemaking (pdf), published ‍in the Federal ⁢Register, seeks ⁣to⁣ impose separate new ‍efficiency standards for⁢ power and water ⁣usage ⁢for standard-size and compact dishwashers during ⁢their regular cycles.

As part ⁣of​ the ​public comment⁣ process on the proposal, the coalition of 19‍ industry and consumer groups led by​ the⁢ Competitive ‌Enterprise⁣ Institute (CEI) on ‌Tuesday ​submitted ‌a‌ detailed​ criticism of the proposal.

The groups urged the Biden‍ administration to withdraw the rule, arguing that existing dishwasher standards ⁣are already ‌causing “serious problems” for consumers ​and that tightening ​them⁢ further ‍would worsen the ‌problems​ and undercut consumer​ protections.

“While each of the Biden administration’s recently-proposed appliance‌ measures raises‍ a unique‍ set of ⁣risks ⁢for‍ consumers, ⁤the​ proposed dishwasher‍ rule at ‌issue here​ is​ particularly harmful,” the groups ⁣wrote in the‍ submission.

The current‌ energy and water⁣ efficiency standards for ‍dishwashers have already caused significant dissatisfaction among consumers‍ due ​to ⁤far longer cycle ‍times, the groups ⁤said.

Tightening these measures ‍further by way of the​ proposed ‌rule would ⁢likely worsen the situation but⁣ offer minimal additional​ savings, ‌they‌ argued.

“We‌ believe the‍ proposed ⁤rule‍ should be withdrawn⁢ and that the Department ⁢of⁣ Energy (DOE) should shift ⁤its​ focus to addressing the⁣ drawbacks caused​ by its existing dishwasher regulations,” the ​coalition wrote.

DOE‌ did not ⁤immediately⁣ respond⁤ to a ​request for ⁣comment on the coalition’s criticism ‌of the proposed rule and its ⁣request for‌ withdrawal.

More⁣ Details

The DOE​ proposal⁣ seeks to ⁤cut ⁤energy‌ use by ‌27 percent and water use ⁣by‌ 34 ⁤percent⁢ in​ new conventional household dishwashers⁣ made⁣ in‍ the ‍United​ States or‍ imported⁤ into ​the⁢ country, starting‌ three years after the publication​ of the final rule.

This‍ means ⁣that‌ the‍ maximum⁤ estimated annual⁢ energy use ⁣for standard-sized dishwashers would be 223 kWh/year, and ⁤the maximum per-cycle ⁢water‍ consumption ‍would ​be 3.3 gallons.


Samsung’s Chef Collection dishwasher is displayed ‍at the ⁤Mandalay Bay‍ Convention‍ Center for‌ the 2015 ​International CES⁣ in Las Vegas, Nevada, on Jan.‍ 5, ⁣2015. ⁤(Ethan Miller/Getty Images)

Compact dishwasher models ​would, ⁣under​ the ‌proposed⁢ rulemaking, ⁤see ‍a 22 percent reduction​ in power use and an‍ 11 percent lower ‍water ‍usage. ‌Specifically, this ⁣would mean that compact dishwasher​ models made in or imported into the United States ⁣would⁢ have ⁢a maximum annual energy use of 174​ kWh/year and ⁤maximum water consumption of ​3.1 gallons.

If​ the⁢ new rules⁣ are ⁤adopted within the ‌DOE’s suggested timeframe, they ‍would come⁣ into effect in 2027. The agency estimated ​that the new rules would⁤ save ⁤consumers nearly ⁤$3 billion in⁤ utility bills over ⁢30 ⁤years.

“This Administration⁣ is using all ⁤of ⁣the tools at ‍our disposal to⁤ save ​Americans money ⁤while⁤ promoting innovations that ⁣will ⁢reduce carbon pollution⁣ and combat the climate ⁢crisis,”⁣ Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm​ said ‌in‌ a statement at the time​ that the ⁣proposal was announced in May.

The ‌CEI-led ​coalition, however, insisted that ‍the proposed ⁢rule ‍would not work as promised​ and would ⁤lead​ to⁢ both longer cycle times ​and ‍reduced ⁢dishwasher performance.

“Longer cycle ‌times ​are not the ​only ​problem,” ⁣the coalition wrote ‍in its ⁤comments‌ to⁢ DOE, pointing to reduced performance in terms of ⁤reliability, cleaning, and drying.

“Though not‍ well‌ documented,⁤ the ‍previous ‍efficiency⁢ standards have led⁣ to other performance drawbacks. For⁢ example, those who‍ repair dishwashers have seen⁤ changes in reliability” resulting ⁢from DOE’s earlier​ actions.

“Both⁤ the frequency ​of repairs ‌as ‌well⁢ as their cost⁢ have ​risen,” the ​groups continued.

Cleaning performance has also ​seen adverse‌ impacts, the‍ coalition stated,‌ noting ​“more⁢ instances‌ of ⁢consumers‌ running ‍loads twice to​ get ⁣them sufficiently clean.”

Many models that comply ​with ​the DOE’s ​earlier standard‌ don’t‍ dry ⁢dishes fully, they continued, adding that ‌the‌ advantages of‌ using ‍dishwashers over washing by ⁤hand would⁣ be further ⁤undermined by​ the agency’s ⁣new⁤ draft rule.

“Dishwasher performance⁢ would ‌only be ‌made worse by the proposed rule, which ratchets ‌downs ⁤further on the energy and⁤ water ⁣limits ⁣that are ‌the acknowledged ⁤source of ⁣the ⁤problems,” the coalition⁤ wrote.

Signatories‌ of the letter to DOE ⁤include The‌ Heritage ⁤Foundation,⁣ Institute ‌for⁣ Energy Research, Heartland Institute, American‌ Consumer Institute, Americans for‍ Prosperity, and American ‍First ​Policy Institute.

Opposition ‍to new ⁤dishwasher efficiency⁣ standards comes⁤ amid the⁢ Biden ‌administration’s broader⁣ crackdown ⁤on home‌ appliances in the name of fighting climate change.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker